Corps class privilege plan considered
By Jakob Hosmer
Norwich Guidon Staff Writer
Scott McKay took the rank of Regimental Command Sergeant Major in the
Corps of Cadets with the hope that he could help the Corps grow in a
positive direction.
The new position, he hopes, will offer him the chance to play an
important role in setting up a policy that he and many others feel will be
one of these changes for the better.
According to McKay, 20, a junior chemistry major from Laplata, Md., the upper
chain of command wants to bring back a class privilege system, whereby
cadets gain privileges with each year they move up in the Corps
of Cadets.
The policy would mostly pertain to what cadets are and are not allowed
to keep in their rooms. It would also be implemented in order to more
clearly define the class years.
"In talking with other military schools, we've found that
sophomores having all the same privileges make them think they're
equal to seniors, which in reality they are, but in the sense of
the Corps they are not," McKay said. "Seniors have been
here longer, so they deserve more, much like in the military the
longer you're in the service the more you get paid."
Cadet Col. David Cedarleaf, 22, a senior political science major from
Fairport, NY, has also taken an active role in helping other members in
the upper chain of command in the Corps solidify plans for the class
system.
"We want to shy away from adding privileges. Instead, we'd
like to start to wean away some privileges instead of starting with
everything at once," Cedarleaf said.
Scheduled to go into effect as early as next year, Cedarleaf said the
plan will be to give out a list of what certain classes can and cannot
bring back with them at the end of this year, and then mail out the same
list this summer.
"That way, people won't come back with the wrong stuff,"
he said.
"A committee made up mostly of selected juniors will make
a list of privileges for each class along with a way to implement
it, and the final plan will be presented to the commandant's staff,"
McKay said.
"The commandant's office is really good on trusting our judgment,"
Cedarleaf said.
The new policy will not be a change as much as it will be the
reinstatement of an older policy that was discontinued in the fall of
1999.
According to Cedarleaf, it's a plan that's been off and on in
past years. He said that during his sophomore year the upper command
had some very strong ideas, but the senior cadets grew tired of
it and didn't enforce it, anymore, because it was too difficult
to keep up with.
"This would be a good example of the Corps running the Corps,
as long as people are willing to take an active role and responsibility
and take it seriously," Cedarleaf said.
"If you're putting the policy out and you're the Corps leadership,
you need to take responsibility for your actions. If you want it
to happen, you need to make it happen," Cedarleaf said, "we
need the active participation of the people."
The prospect of such a policy has gained mixed reactions from
cadets from different class years.
"I don't see how it would help the Corps. I don't think it
would change anything," said Nicole DeBrauwere, 20, a sophomore
international studies major from Los Angeles, Calif.
"I think they should bring it back, because it gives people
something to look forward to and defines the classes," said
Chris Brackett, 21, a senior communications major from Los Angeles,
Calif. In addition to this, Brackett adds that a class system is
also in keeping with traditions of a military school.
"I think there should be a class system, limited though, just
so your class will mean something. That way seniors and juniors
are respected not because they have rank, but because they've been
here," said James Blume, a junior civil engineering major from
Hamden, Mass. "On the other hand, I'm going to be a senior
next year, so I don't really care, anyway."
The juniors and other chain of command maintain a positive outlook on
implementing such a system. While helping with such tasks as defining
classes and having a progression in the Corps, McKay thinks it will be
accepted well.
Back to Guidon index
|